Tagged with Application

Using Declarations to Invoke AIA First-Inventor-To-File Exceptions

Author: Stephanie M. Sanders
Editor: Maureen D. Queler

This chart illustrates how to use declarations under 37 C.F.R. § 1.130 to invoke an exception to 35 U.S.C. § 102(a) and have a reference disqualified as prior art. This information only applies to an America Invents Act (AIA) patent application, i.e., an application having an effective filing date on or after March 16, 2013.

Click here to read a full explanation of the chart above.

 

DISCLAIMER: Although we wish to hear from you, information exchanged in this blog cannot and does not create an attorney-client relationship. Please do not post any information that you consider to be personal or confidential. If you wish for Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP to consider representing you, in order to establish an attorney-client relationship you must first enter a written representation agreement with Finnegan. Contact us for additional information.  Additional disclaimer information.

Tagged , , , , , , ,

Timeline of Declaration Filing/Using an ADS

Author: Adriana L. Burgy
Editor: Michele C. Bosch

Timeline of Declaration Filing Using an ADS - 2015

The chart above and the information below provide guidance for filing an inventor’s oath or declaration and submitting an Application Data Sheet (ADS). The information is meant to illustrate different scenarios and as such, one should consult the specific regulations based on any particular scenario.

Click here to read a full explanation of the chart above.

DISCLAIMER: Although we wish to hear from you, information exchanged in this blog cannot and does not create an attorney-client relationship. Please do not post any information that you consider to be personal or confidential. If you wish for Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP to consider representing you, in order to establish an attorney-client relationship you must first enter a written representation agreement with Finnegan. Contact us for additional information. Additional disclaimer information.

Tagged , , , , , , , ,

PTO releases Abstract Idea examples for analyzing claims under § 101

Author: Christopher C. Johns
Editor: Maureen D. Queler

The USPTO recently released a set of examples for evaluating claims under 35 U.S.C. § 101 in view of Alice Corp. Pty. Ltd. v. CLS Bank Int’l., 134 S.Ct. 2347 (2014). To the bane of many patent prosecutors in the business methods, financial, and software‑related arts, patent examiners have been applying a loose interpretation of this decision to reject entire classes of patent applications. With the release of these examples, however, the tide may begin to turn.

Continue reading

Tagged , , , , , ,