Author: Alice Wang
One of the most historic changes made by the AIA is the conversion of the U.S. patent system from a “first-to-invent” to a “first-inventor-to-file” system effective March 16, 2013. On February 14, 2013, the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) issued final rules governing the “first-inventor-to-file” (FITF) provisions enacted by Section 3 of the AIA. Concurrently, the USPTO published Examination Guidelines for Implementing the First Inventor to File Provisions of the AIA (Examination Guidelines).
The FITF final rules revise the rules of practice to make them more consistent with the AIA and address examination issues resulting from those patent law changes. The Examination Guidelines set forth, for instance, the agency’s interpretation of 35 U.S.C. §§ 102 and 103 as amended by the AIA. In particular, the Examination Guidelines explain the type of prior art that can preclude a patent under 35 U.S.C. § 102(a) and the type of prior art that falls under the exceptions of § 102(b).
PTO Rules and Examination Guidelines
- Final Rule – Changes to Implement the First-Inventor-to-File Provisions of the Leahy-Smith America Invents Act (February 14, 2013)
- Examination Guidelines – Examination Guidelines for Implementing the First-Inventor-to-File Provisions of the Leahy-Smith America Invents Act (February 14, 2013)
DISCLAIMER: Although we wish to hear from you, information exchanged in this blog cannot and does not create an attorney-client relationship. Please do not post any information that you consider to be personal or confidential. If you wish for Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP to consider representing you, in order to establish an attorney-client relationship you must first enter a written representation agreement with Finnegan. Contact us for additional information. Additional disclaimer information.