AT THE PTAB BLOG
Effective January 16, 2018, the USPTO charges the following fees for inter partes review (IPR), post-grant review (PGR), and the transitional program for covered business method review (CBM):
The fees are identical regardless of whether the petitioner is considered a large, small, or micro entity for purposes of calculating other USPTO fees. Each of the fees identified in the chart are due at the time the IPR, PGR, or CBM is filed—even the post-institution fees. If a proceeding is not instituted, the petitioner may request a refund of the post-institution fees.
DISCLAIMER: Although we wish to hear from you, information exchanged in this blog cannot and does not create an attorney-client relationship. Please do not post any information that you consider to be personal or confidential. If you wish for Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP to consider representing you, in order to establish an attorney-client relationship you must first enter a written representation agreement with Finnegan. Contact us for additional information. One of our lawyers will be happy to discuss the possibility of representation with you. Additional disclaimer information.
Due to international data regulations, we’ve updated our privacy policy. Click here to read our privacy policy in full.
We use cookies on this website to provide you with the best user experience. By accepting cookies, you agree to our use of cookies. Please note that if you opt not to accept or if you disable cookies, the “Your Finnegan” feature on this website will be disabled as well. For more information on how we use cookies, please see our Privacy Policy.
Finnegan is thrilled to announce the launch of our new blog, Ad Law Buzz, devoted solely to breaking news, developments, trends, and analysis in advertising law.