Judicial Breakdown

Authors: Elliot C. Cook, Daniel F. Klodowski, David C. Seastrunk

Our judicial breakdown statistics track and categorize all PTAB final written decisions on the merits, listing the top ten judges in every category. These statistics do not include settlements, requests for adverse judgment, motions to terminate, still-pending cases, requests for rehearing, and appellate outcomes. We carefully analyzed which decisions were labeled correctly in the USPTO’s Patent Review Processing System (PRPS), tracked the number of claims instituted, the number of claims held unpatentable, and the number of claims in which the petitioner failed to meet its burden to prove unpatentability. Our statistics should be considered an estimate and depict various ways to display the underlying information.

 

DISCLAIMER: These materials have been prepared solely for educational purposes to contribute to the understanding of U.S. intellectual property law. While the authors and Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP (including Finnegan Europe LLP, and Fei Han Foreign Legal Affairs Law Firm) made every attempt to ensure that these materials are accurate, errors or omissions may be contained therein, for which any liability is disclaimed.

Although we wish to hear from you, information exchanged in this blog cannot and does not create an attorney-client relationship. Please do not post any information that you consider to be personal or confidential. If you wish for Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP to consider representing you, in order to establish an attorney-client relationship you must first enter a written representation agreement with Finnegan. Contact us for additional information. Additional disclaimer information.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *