Authors: Daniel F. Klodowski and David Seastrunk
The following statistics provide several perspectives on post-grant practice at the USPTO. The information was compiled from all PTAB final written decisions on the merits published on the USPTO’s Patent Review Processing System (PRPS) as of the stated date. These statistics do not include settlements, requests for adverse judgment, motions to terminate, still-pending cases, requests for rehearing, or appellate outcomes. The statistics reflect case outcomes on both a per-claim and per-case basis, and incorporate a number of decisions and assumptions designed to eliminate redundancy while providing the most impartial, accurate, and useful information possible. While care has been taken to ensure the accuracy of this data, these numbers should be treated as an estimate.
DISCLAIMER: These materials have been prepared solely for educational purposes to contribute to the understanding of U.S. intellectual property law. While the authors and Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP (including Finnegan Europe LLP, and Fei Han Foreign Legal Affairs Law Firm) made every attempt to ensure that these materials are accurate, errors or omissions may be contained therein, for which any liability is disclaimed.
Although we wish to hear from you, information exchanged in this blog cannot and does not create an attorney-client relationship. Please do not post any information that you consider to be personal or confidential. If you wish for Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP to consider representing you, in order to establish an attorney-client relationship you must first enter a written representation agreement with Finnegan. Contact us for additional information. Additional disclaimer information.